We study the effects of a bank's engagement in trading. Traditional banking is
relationship-based: not scalable, long-term oriented, with high implicit capital, and low
risk (thanks to the law of large numbers). Trading is transactions-based: scalable, shortterm,
capital constrained, and with the ability to generate risk from concentrated positions.
When a bank engages in trading, it can use its 'spare' capital to profitablity expand the
scale of trading. However, there are two inefficiencies. A bank may allocate too much
capital to trading ex-post, compromising the incentives to build relationships ex-ante. And
a bank may use trading for risk-shifting. Financial development augments the scalability
of trading, which initially benefits conglomeration, but beyond some point inefficiencies
dominate. The deepending of the financial markets in recent decades leads trading in
banks to become increasingly risky, so that problems in managing and regulating trading
in banks will persist for the foreseeable future. The analysis has implications for capital
regulation, subsidiarization, and scope and scale restrictions in banking.
English |
Economics- Macroeconomics , Economics / General , International - Economics , Bank regulation , proprietary trading , relationship banking , Volcker rule